home | about us | contact | site map | credits | disclaimer | bookmark

Online Casino News


Tuesday, May 12, 2009

William Hill, Joyland Casino and Playtech founder and convicted fraudster Teddy Sagi: $2,000,000 jackpot winnings confiscated


In August 2008, Joyland Casino announced the winner of a slot jackpot in excess of $4,000,000. The winners page states:


Sylvia P. won $4,188,719.98 playing the Beach Life Jackpot


As I type this, May 12th 2009, I see that the jackpot from eight months ago is still emblazoned on the homepage:


Joyland Jackpot claim


In fact, this is a total misrepresentation of the true situation.


As reported in the "Stipulations on Playtech progressive win" discussion at Casinomeister, Silvia P did indeed win a jackpot of $4,188,719.98. Unfortunately, Joyland Casino had a maximum $9000 per month cashout limit in its terms and conditions at the time of the win.

At this rate of payment, the win would have taken a total of 38 years and two months to be settled in full, with the final payment planned for July 2046.

Joyland refused to waive the cashout limit and settle the full amount immediately, notwithstanding the unique size of the jackpot. Instead, they offered to pay the player an upfront sum of $2,300,000, or just over half the total.

It should be emphasized that this would not be in addition to $9000 per month until the full amount was settled, but a half payment, $1,900,000 less than she the player thought she had won, and no more.

Considering that it would take fully twenty one years to receive even this vastly reduced sum in monthly installments, and that there would be no way of knowing whether or not Joyland Casino would even be around in twenty one years' time (let alone the thirty eight years required for full payment) this seemed the better of two bad options, and the player accepted it.

Once this half payment was made, the player's account was closed.


So, while taking advantage of all the publicity potential of this win, Joyland Casino short-changed the player, confiscated a grand total of one million nine hundred thousand dollars, paid her half the jackpot and left her feeling miserable.

This action has been roundly condemned by anyone and everyone in the online gambling industry who has expressed an opinion, and rightly so.


But: so what? - you might ask. This is hardly noteworthy, aside from the sheer numbers involved. Reprehensible behaviour from the online gambling industry is a common occurance, and Joyland Casino was already a well known rogue casino on the back of the confiscatiion of many thousands of dollars from players a few years ago - see the Joyland comp points fiasco at Casinomeister.

So why raise our eyebrows on the basis of yet another online casino withholding yet more legitimate winnings from yet another player?

Let's look a bit further.


This was a progressive jackpot. Progressive jackpots are played across many different casinos of a given supplier, and when the jackpot is hit the participating casinos all contribute. So, if fifty casinos were running the game in question, each casino would contribute $83,775. Those individual casinos would not be losing out, as they would have a made a lot more than their 80K contribution over the course of the game - only a tiny proportion of each wager funds the progressive, the majority goes to the casino.

The software provider then collects all the contributions, and sends the total amount to the casino at which the jackpot was hit. The casino in question then pays the player.


So in this case, using my figures, each Playtech casino participating in the "Beach Life" progressive slot jackpot would have sent a cheque for $83,775 to Playtech.

Playtech then sent those fifty 80K contributions to the owners / managers of Joyland Casino, totalling $4,188,719.98.

Joyland casino would also have contributed $83,775.

But Joyland didn't send its fellow casinos' contributions to the winning player. They kept back $1,900,000.


Where is this money?


It belongs to the player. However, since the player was forced to relenquish almost half, then it belongs to the casinos who contributed to the jackpot pool. It certainly does NOT belong to the owners of Joyland Casino.


The story gets more interesting at this point.


Just two months after Silvia P's win, UK gambling behemoth William Hill acquired "certain Playtech assets" - see the Playtech transaction announcement at the Will Hill corporate site:



On 20 October 2008 we announced that we are combining William Hill Interactive, our online operations, with certain purchased assets from Playtech Ltd, one of the world's leading software companies.



"Certain assets"?

Which assets?


It was left to the Infopowa online gambling commentary service, run by Bryan "Jetset" Cullingworth, to clarify the matter after contact with William Hill, in the Webroute and Cpays part of Will Hill Playtech deal report:



It has now been revealed that those purchased assets consist principally of Webroute Services and CPays.



Cpays, now under the William Hill banner, has been renamed Affiliates United, whose brand includes Joyland Casino.

So the assets William Hill acquired from Playtech included Joyland Casino.


Playtech's legal custodianship of Joyland, in its turn, appears to have been brief and no more than a legal technicality. According to the Playtech buys assets from major shareholder article at TradingMarkets.com, The previous owner of the "previous assets" in question was one Teddy Sagi:



The interesting point is the identity of the owners of two of the purchased assets. Playtech states that Uniplay International Ltd and Six Digits Trading Ltd are two companies own (sic) by trusts whose sole beneficiary is Sagi, who owns 41.1 percent of Playtech.



Teddy Sagi is in fact the founder of Playtech. His shareholding is substantial, valued currently around 463 million dollars - see the LSE Playtech listing. While he is no longer the owner of Playtech, his 41.1% shareholding gives him substantial influence in the company.


Therefore, when Playtech collected those contributions from the casinos participating in Silvia P's jackpot, they sent them to the companies whose beneficiary was their founder and largest individual shareholder.


I wonder how those other casinos feel about this? Since only half of their payments went to the player, would these casinos now like to be reacquainted with the other half of their money?


Teddy Sagi is in fact a convicted fraudster. According to a Jerusalem Post article...



THE Tel Aviv District Court yesterday sentenced broker Teddy Sagi to nine months in prison imprisonment plus an additional 15 months suspended sentence and a fine of NIS 300,000.

Sagi, whose prison term starts on February 25, admitted to bribery, fraud and stock manipulation.



That's a $70,000 USD fine and nine months in prison for bribery and fraud for Playtech's founder and current main shareholder.


William Hill, the current owners of Joyland, claim to have bought only the company's assets, and are not liable for any previous debts. Although this sounds like a shelving of responsibilities, it's not an unreasonable position for them to take.


Playtech, however, have to date failed to comment.



0 Previous Comments


Post a Comment

Monday, May 04, 2009

Casino Warnings section


I've finally got around to building a rogue casino warnings section, highlighting any and all rogue aspects of the online gambling industry on the main site as opposed to exclusively in blog posts. This was largely on the advice of Michael Shakleford, the "Wizard Of Odds", to whose work this site owes so much.



11 Previous Comments


Hello everyone. I am NEW to the forum although NOT really new to on-line gaming. I just want to WARN any players thinking of playing at Mandarin Palace casino, I strongly urge you to re-consider. I foolishly deposited, as we all do on occasion and out of curiosity, $100 and turned it into $1007, exactly and I haven't been paid and it's going on 3-weeks. Apparently, they are a SCAM site and do NOT pay !! Furthermore, they are totally unknown/unlicensed, to say the least. They do NOT disclose the owners/operators or their whereabouts. I WONDER WHY? They ONLY allow invited players, like myself, which I regret in hindsight, to play at their casino. They use the worst proprietary software, I have EVER seen!! They also, that is if you miraculously win, like I did, make excuses NOT to PAY!! I have repeatedly tried to contact the elusive and anonymous manager "Tommy Lee" who is clearly a fictitious person. I only get to Freddy Hills and the Rude Sally Banks and Ben Moore.. They NEVER pass you onto this so-called "Tommy Lee" which was the "red flag" right there.. among other unscrupulous things they do. I asked them how they got my name to send me this UNSOLICITED software/CD by mail, ALL of the incompetent staff keeps telling me from a "LIST" but they don't disclose the details, of course. They are a predatory NEW casino with NO credentials whatsoever and I am sorry I was enticed by the UNWANTED package that arrived at my home and tried them out. They Stink and I implore any of you that also got this software you didn't request, to STEER CLEAR from Mandarin Palace at ALL COST!

By Anonymous Tom Foselli, at 12:34 am  


I'll certainly include your experience on my page.

By Blogger 100% Gambler, at 10:49 pm  




New entry, tied to the Cherry Red matter:

Moneybookers warning.

By Blogger 100% Gambler, at 1:45 pm  


The long-overdue Fortune Lounge warning.

By Blogger 100% Gambler, at 3:01 pm  







Post a Comment

Friday, May 01, 2009

Pontoon correction


Having archived the pontoon page three years ago, I noticed an error in the basic strategy charts earlier today, where soft 21 was listed as a default stand on three and four cards - see also the "soft totals" chart on the RTG basic strategy page.

The correct plays are to either double if possible or stand with three cards, and to double if possible or hit with four.

These errors are now corrected. My apologies.



0 Previous Comments


Post a Comment


May 2005 | June 2005 | July 2005 | September 2005 | October 2005 | November 2005 | December 2005 | January 2006 | February 2006 | March 2006 | April 2006 | May 2006 | August 2006 | October 2006 | January 2007 | February 2007 | March 2007 | May 2007 | June 2007 | July 2007 | January 2008 | February 2008 | March 2008 | April 2008 | June 2008 | July 2008 | September 2008 | October 2008 | December 2008 | January 2009 | February 2009 | March 2009 | May 2009 | June 2009 | July 2009 | August 2009 | September 2009 | October 2009 | November 2009 | December 2009 | January 2010 | February 2010 | March 2010 | April 2010 | May 2010 | June 2010 | July 2010 | August 2010 | October 2010 | November 2010 | December 2010 | January 2011 | February 2011 | March 2011 | April 2011 | May 2011 | June 2011 | July 2011 | August 2011 | September 2011 | December 2011 | February 2012 | May 2012 | July 2012 | August 2012 | March 2016 | April 2016 | June 2016 | November 2016 | December 2016 | March 2017 | May 2017 | June 2017 | August 2017 | Atom feed
© 2005 hundred percent gambling

ONLINE CASINO NEWS

• Online casino news


2016

• Can't split 10s?
• Overbetting
• EV charts
• The IPCA
• Basic strategy master
• Back to the future
• Site hack

2015

• Better comp value
• Pit bosses are a pest
• 32Red buys Roxy Palace
• Winneronline is gone
• Paradise Win Casino
• Blackjack simple strategy

2014

• Court refuses Ivey winnings
• Phil Ivey versus Crockfords
• 32Red does the right thing
• Wizard Of Odds sold
• Gambling addict sues Ritz
• Better blackjack conditions
• FL: the beat goes on
• Phil Ivey and the Borgata
• LadbrokesFOBT profit
• Chat with the Met
• "Bonus abuse" and the Met
• Casino industry crooks.
• Debate to curb the FOBTs
• Labour idea to ban FOBTs

2013

• Ruby Fortune: terms buried
• Royal Vegas: bad outcome
• Russia illegalises gambling
• RV: player breaks no rules
• Gib casinos and UK laws
• The GGC (GRA) useless
• BetFred rigged games 9
• BetFred rigged games 8
• Betfred rigged games 7
• BetFred rigged games 6
• BetFred rigged games 5
• BetFred rigged games 4
• Phil Ivey: is he entitled?
• BetFred rigged games 3
• Betfred rigged games 2
• BetFred: rigged games 1
•  UK GLA Act 2013
• 888.com and Facebook
• Crockfords denies Phil Ivey
• Bad dealers
• Betfair Blackjack test
• Playtech software update
• Cheap blackjack
• Hippodrome Casino

2012

• The UK's FOBT addiction
• Conan Casino beware
• Intercasino misleading
• Fortune Lounge
• UK Gambling Commission

2011

• Small Claims Court
• Gamcare
• Full Tilt Poker saved
• Full Tilt ponzi scheme
• Casino Barcelona
• Irakli Kacharava
• Betfair processor no pay
• Full Tilt licensing meeting
• UK Gambling Commission
• Full Tilt Poker investors
• Full Tilt license suspended
• Twitter
• Betfair resolution
• Casino Web Scripts 2
• 32Red bonus marketing
• Casino Web Scripts 1
• Poker domains seized
• eCOGRA independent?
• Easystreet Sports theft
• Betfair to Gibraltar
• Rigged blackjack 2
• Betfair responses
• Rigged blackjack
• 888.com theft
• Betfair poker problem
• UK gambling controls
• Harry Reid

2010

• eWallet Xpress
• Kevin Stillmock
• Blog back up
• Betfair happy hour
• Ladbrokes bonus increase
• Absolute Poker tricks US
• Absolute Poker rigged
• Last position no difference
• Basic strategy simplified
• Online casino bonuses
• Righthaven LLC
• Ladbrokes bonus rules
• Malta LGA nonsense
• Purple Lounge theft
• UK affiliates issue
• Online casino problems
• GPWA code of conduct
• One Club Casino problems
• Rushmore theft resolved
• Realtime Gaming cheats
• Absolute Poker Ultimate Bet
• Rushmore Casino theft
• Ask gamblers service
• Intercasino bonus terms
• Profitting from poverty
• Gambling dooms UK to ruin
• Want To Stop Gambling
• Gambling Therapy
• Gordon Moody Association
• Breakeven
• Online gambling jobs
• Gamblock
• Gamble Aware
• Gamblers Anonymous
• Gamcare
• Video poker auto hold
• Gambling Wages help offer
• Blackjack double down
• Intercasino rules
• Tradition Casino warning
• Tradition Casino problem
• Be The Dealer
• eCOGRA approved casinos
• UK underage gambling
• iGaming Super Show
• eCOGRA reputable portals
• eCOGRA exposed
• Slots Oasis warning
• Slots Oasis problem
• HR 2267 comments
• HR 2267 proposed bill
• Search fully functional
• Gambling hearing delayed
• Betfair download blackjack
• Betfair blackjack
• The Federal Wie Act
• Casino Rewards warning
• Kahnawake dumps GP
• GP dumps Microgaming
• UK online gambling
• Gambling checklist
• Online casino problems
• Gambling Grumbles
• Casino Rewards
• Brian Cullingworth
• Casino Wager Tracker
• Grand Prive affiliates
• Jackpots Heaven Casino
• Kahnawake commission
• UK gambling problem
• eCOGRA and Grand Prive
• Bet365 misleading bonus
• Mastercard and Visa
• Online gambling rules
• 32Red sign up bonus
• Ladbrokes data theft
• Ladbrokes unfair settlement
• Palace group bonus rules
• Grand Prive and eCOGRA

2009

• Blackjack in the UK
• Seminole Hard Rock
• The APCW and MG
• Sportsbook.com
• Slot beaters slot strategy
• Rushmore Casino theft
• Paddy Power affiliates
• Slots
• 888.com problem
• The UIGEA
• Neteller contest winner
• 888.com bonus problem
• Casino Club meeting
• Online casino directory
• 32Red debit card bonus
• Blue Square Casino
• Budapest Affiliate Expo
• Rushmore payment issues
• Modern Blackjack volume 1
• Eurolinx certain insolvency
• Buzzluck winnings theft
• PaddyPower removed
• 32Red lawsuit
• William Hill Casino Club
• Betfair video poker
• APCW underage children
• Odds page updates
• VP Genius
• Video poker page updates
• Blackjack page updates
• Progression page updates
• Single deck page updates
• Betfair Playtech license
• Cherry Red Casino
• Online gambling debate
• William Hill & Teddy Sagi
• Rogue casinos section
• Pontoon correction
• Microgaming poker scandal
• Casino Club confiscation
• Casino Club steals €8000
• Villa Fortuna Casino
• Grand Prive affiliate issue
• CAP and Cardspike 2
• Virgin Casino bad results
• CAP and Cardspike 1

2008

• iNetbet removal from site
• Mario Galea and Malta LGA
• Cold Mountain Resort
• The AGCC
• Moneybookers privacy
• Virtual Casino rebranding
• Captain Jack Casino
• Royal Ace Casino
• Ringmaster Casino
• Catseye Casino
• Lucky Palm Casino
• Pharaohs Gold Casino
• Goldstream Casino
• Plantet 7 Casino
• Betfair bonus confiscation
• Malta LGA worthless
• The GIA
• Interwetten theft of £5000
• Lucky Ace winnings stolen
• The KGC and Absolute

2007

• HippoJo Casino
• Microgaming All Aces VP
• Neteller issues
• Lou Fabiano responds
• Lou Fabiano selling stats
• Betfair Zero Lounge
• ICE 2007 brief visit
• RTG cancels ICE visit

2006

• Crystal Palace Casino theft
• eCOGRA & Jackpot Factory
• English Harbour cheating
• Boss Media single deck
• Bella Vegas / Grand Prive
• The KGC worthless
• Gambling Federation
• Playtech sued
• Meeting Andrew Beveridge
• Playtech confirmed listing
• African Palace Casino
• G-Fed ICE discussion
• Playtech ICE meeting
• Playtech issues escalation
• Chartwell hands off

2005

• Crystal Gaming silence
• Price Waterhouse Cooper
• Crystal Gaming flotation 2
• Vegas Frontier
• Crystal Gaming flotation 1
• Playtech public listing
• African Palace & Indio
• Kiwi Casino
• Rochester Casino
• G-Fed theft 2
• Warren Cloud best avoided
• Golden Palace stupidity 3
• Golden Palace stupidity 2
• G-Fed theft 1
• Golden Palace stupidity 1
• Russia online expansion
• Wan Doy Pairs Poker
• Microgaming CPU usage
• Net Entertainment RNG
• Cryptologic & William Hill
• Casino growth slow
• English Harbour paying
• Fraudster or not
• Blackjack surrender
• Integrity casino group audit